نوع المقالة : Research Paper
المؤلف
الكلية التقنية الادارية / الجامعة التقنية الشمالية
الملخص
في الوقت الحاضر، تستمر المنظمات في النمو بشكل أكبر وأكبر ، ليس فقط في عدد الموظفين ، ولكن في عدد الإدارات ونوع الموظفين. في مثل هذه الحالات ، تعتبر أنظمة المعلومات القائمة على الحوسبة السحابية مفيدة للمنظمات من خلال قدراتها المعلوماتية الفائقة مقارنة بأنظمة المعلومات التقليدية ، ومع ذلك، هناك القليل من الدراسات الأكاديمية التي تعاملت مع النظامين معًا، وتركز فقط على الجوانب الفنية، والمحددات التي تؤثر على اعتماد نظم معلومات الإدارة السحابية لم يتم فحصها من منظور المستخدم”. في هذه الدراسة، نحاول التحقيق في محددات تبني نظم المعلومات الادارية المستند الى السحابة بالاستناد الى نظرية التحيز في الحالة الراهنة كأساس لإعطاء توجيهات لمقدمي الخدمات السحابية حول كيفية تصميم منتجاتهم من أجل زيادة الاعتماد والاستخدام. تمثلت عينة الدراسة بالموظفين العاملين في الكلية التقنية الهندسية الموصل وبلغ حجم العينة (100( موظف، وتم تحليل البيانات باستخدام Smart PLS . اظهرت النتائج أن المخاطر المتصورة هي العامل الأكثر أهمية فيما يتعلق بمحددات التبني السلوكي لاستخدام Cloud-MIS متبوعة بتجنب الندم والقصور الذاتي. في النهاية ، توصي هذه الدراسة الباحثين بإمكانية الجمع بين النماذج المستخدمة لقياس محددات التبني لاستكشاف المزيد من العوامل التي لها تأثير على نظام معلومات الإدارة القائم على السحابة
الكلمات الرئيسة
[1] J. Gómez, J. F. Huete, O. Hoyos, L. Perez, and D. Grigori, “Interaction system based on internet of things as support for education,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 21, pp. 132–139, 2013.
[2] L. Gao and X. Bai, “A unified perspective on the factors influencing consumer acceptance of internet of things technology,” Asia Pacific J. Mark. Logist., 2014.
[3] H. Bauer, M. Patel, and J. Veira, “The Internet of Things: Sizing up the opportunity,” Retrieved from McKinsey http//www. mckinsey. com/insights/high_tech_telecoms_internet/the_internet_of_t hings_sizing_up_the_opportunity, 2014.
[4] S. Gul et al., “A survey on role of internet of things in education,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Netw. Secur., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 159–165, 2017.
[5] H. S. Hashim and Z. A. Al-Sulami, “A model of factors influencing users’ adoption of internet of things services: A Case Study of Iraqi Educational Institutions,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, vol. 769, no. 1, p. 12006.
[6] C.-L. Hsu and J. C.-C. Lin, “An empirical examination of consumer adoption of Internet of Things services: Network externalities and concern for information privacy perspectives,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 62, pp. 516–527, 2016.
[7] J. Greenough, “The ‘Internet of Things’ will be the world’s most massive device market and save companies billions of dollars,” Bus. Insid., vol. 28, 2014.
[8] V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view,” MIS Q., pp. 425–478, 2003.
[9] P. Jayashankar, S. Nilakanta, W. J. Johnston, P. Gill, and R. Burres, “IoT adoption in agriculture: the role of trust, perceived value and risk,” J. Bus. Ind. Mark., 2018.
[10] W. Ben Arfi, I. Ben Nasr, T. Khvatova, and Y. Ben Zaied, “Understanding acceptance of eHealthcare by IoT natives and IoT immigrants: An integrated model of UTAUT, perceived risk, and financial cost,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 163, p. 120437, 2021.
[11] H. Aldowah, S. U. Rehman, S. Ghazal, and I. N. Umar, “Internet of Things in higher education: a study on future learning,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2017, vol. 892, no. 1, p. 12017.
[12] A. M. Alalade, J. O. Ejemeyovwi, E. E. Ekong, and D. Adeyemo, “Internet of things as a tool for enhancement of education administration and delivery,” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, vol. 10, no. 5. pp. 48–62, 2019.
[13] D. D. Ramlowat and B. K. Pattanayak, Exploring the internet of things (IoT) in education: A review, vol. 863. Springer Singapore, 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-3338-5_23.
[14] A. M. Njeru, M. S. Omar, S. Yi, S. Paracha, and M. Wannous, “Using IoT technology to improve online education through data mining,” in 2017 International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI), 2017, pp. 515–518.
[15] N. Sharma, M. Shamkuwar, and I. Singh, “The history, present and future with IoT,” in Internet of Things and Big Data Analytics for Smart Generation, Springer, 2019, pp. 27–51.
[16] H. Algozani and A. Aleryani, “The Impact of IoT on the Higher Education (Review Study),” Saba J. Inf. Technol. Netw. (SJITN)-ISSN 2312-4989, vol. 6, no. 2, 2018.
[17] S. S. Pai, “IOT Application in Education,” Int. J. Adv. Res. Dev., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 20–24, 2017.
[18] A. Majeed and M. Ali, “How Internet-of-Things (IoT) making the university campuses smart? QA higher education (QAHE) perspective,” in 2018 IEEE 8th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), 2018, pp. 646–648.
[19] M. Bagheri and S. H. Movahed, “The effect of the Internet of Things (IoT) on education business model,” in 2016 12th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS), 2016, pp. 435–441.
[20] D. Rico-Bautista, Y. Medina-Cárdenas, and C. D. Guerrero, “Smart University: a Review from the educational and technological view of internet of things,” in International Conference on Information Technology & Systems, 2019, pp. 427–440.
[21] N. Yahaya, N. H. Zakaria, and H. Mohamad Tahir, “An Investigation on the Factors that Influence Readiness of Internet of Things Adoption in Education Sector,” 2018.
[22] M. Thibaud, H. Chi, W. Zhou, and S. Piramuthu, “Internet of Things (IoT) in high-risk Environment, Health and Safety (EHS) industries: A comprehensive review,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 108, pp. 79–95, 2018.
[23] G. Singh, L. Gaur, and R. Ramakrishnan, “Internet of Things—Technology adoption model in India,” Pertanika J. Sci. Technol, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 835–846, 2017.
[24] K. Patil, “Retail adoption of Internet of Things: Applying TAM model,” in 2016 International conference on computing, analytics and security trends (CAST), 2016, pp. 404–409.
[25] J. SUNG and J. JO, “The influence of perceived risk and consumer innovativeness on intention to use of internet of things service.,” J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., vol. 96, no. 4, 2018.
[26] Y. S. Yuan and T. C. Cheah, “A study of internet of things enabled healthcare acceptance in Malaysia,” J. Crit. Rev, vol. 7, pp. 25–32, 2020.
[27] A. B. Jaafreh, “The effect factors in the adoption of Internet of Things (IoT) technology in the SME in KSA: An empirical study,” Int. Rev. Manag. Bus. Res., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 135–148, 2018.
[28] A. Abushakra and D. Nikbin, “Extending the UTAUT2 model to understand the entrepreneur acceptance and adopting internet of things (IoT),” in International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations, 2019, pp. 339–347.
[29] H. S. Hashim and Z. Bin Hassan, “Factors that influence the users’ adoption of cloud computing services at Iraqi Universities: an empirical study,” Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci., vol. 9, no. 27, pp. 379–390, 2015.
[30] J. Khalilzadeh, A. B. Ozturk, and A. Bilgihan, “Security-related factors in extended UTAUT model for NFC based mobile payment in the restaurant industry,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 70, pp. 460–474, 2017.
[31] M. Tsourela and D.-M. Nerantzaki, “An Internet of Things (IoT) Acceptance Model. Assessing Consumer’s Behavior toward IoT Products and Applications,” Futur. Internet, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 191, 2020.
[32] J. Kim and K. S.-S. Lee, “Conceptual model to predict Filipino teachers’ adoption of ICT-based instruction in class: using the UTAUT model,” Asia Pacific J. Educ., pp. 1–15, 2020.
[33] H. Shaikh, M. S. Khan, Z. A. Mahar, M. Anwar, A. Raza, and A. Shah, “A Conceptual Framework for Determining Acceptance of Internet of Things (IoT) in Higher Education Institutions of Pakistan,” in 2019 International Conference on Information Science and Communication Technology (ICISCT), 2019, pp. 1–5.
[34] J.-M. Romero-Rodríguez, S. Alonso-García, J.-A. Marín-Marín, and G. Gómez-García, “Considerations on the Implications of the Internet of Things in Spanish Universities: The Usefulness Perceived by Professors,” Futur. Internet, vol. 12, no. 8, p. 123, 2020.
[35] M. Sinaga, “Adoption of IoT at home in Indonesia.” University of Twente, 2019.
[36] N. D. Azeez and M. M. Lakulu, “Review the success of the mobile government from the government perspective,” Int. J. Humanit. Manag. Soc. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 103–109, 2019.
[37] H. Shaikh, M. S. Khan, Z. A. Mahar, M. Anwar, A. Raza, and A. Shah, “A conceptual framework for determining acceptance of internet of things (IoT) in higher education institutions of Pakistan,” 2019 Int. Conf. Inf. Sci. Commun. Technol. ICISCT 2019, pp. 1–5, 2019, doi: 10.1109/CISCT.2019.8777431.
[38] M. Kassab, J. DeFranco, and P. Laplante, “A systematic literature review on Internet of things in education: Benefits and challenges,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 115–127, 2020.
[39] J.-S. Chou and I. G. A. N. Yutami, “Smart meter adoption and deployment strategy for residential buildings in Indonesia,” Appl. Energy, vol. 128, pp. 336–349, 2014.
[40] D. Belanche, L. V Casaló, and C. Flavián, “Integrating trust and personal values into the Technology Acceptance Model: The case of e-government services adoption,” Cuad. Econ. y Dir. la Empres., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 192–204, 2012.
[41] C. Ennew and H. Sekhon, “Measuring trust in financial services: The trust index,” Consum. Policy Rev., vol. 17, no. 2, p. 62, 2007.
[42] R. Yadav, S. K. Sharma, and A. Tarhini, “A multi-analytical approach to understand and predict the mobile commerce adoption,” J. Enterp. Inf. Manag., 2016.
[43] I. Ajzen, “The theory of planned behavior,” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179–211, 1991.
[44] G. Saxl, L. Görtschacher, T. Ussmueller, and J. Grosinger, “Software-Defined RFID Readers: Wireless Reader Testbeds Exploiting Software-Defined Radios for Enhancements in UHF RFID Systems,” IEEE Microw. Mag., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 46–56, 2021.
[45] T. Maddox, “How IoT will drive the fourth industrial revolution. The Rise of Industrial IoT,” ZDNET, 2019.
[46] S. P. Mathews and R. R. Gondkar, “Solution Integration Approach using IoT in Education System,” Int. J. Comput. Trends Technol., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 45–49, 2017, doi: 10.14445/22312803/ijctt-v45p109.
[47] M. Tsourela and D. M. Nerantzaki, “An internet of things (Iot) acceptance model. assessing consumer’s behavior toward iot products and applications,” Futur. Internet, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1–23, 2020, doi: 10.3390/fi12110191.
[48] N. D. AZEEZ and M. M. LAKULU, “EVALUATION FRAMEWORK OF MGOVERNMENT SERVICES SUCCESS IN MALAYSIA,” J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., vol. 96, no. 24, pp. 8194–8226, 2018.
[49] M. A. Al Mamun and M. R. Yuce, “Sensors and systems for wearable environmental monitoring toward IoT-enabled applications: A review,” IEEE Sens. J., vol. 19, no. 18, pp. 7771–7788, 2019.
[50] Efiloğlu Kurt, Ö. (2019) ‘Examining an e-learning system through the lens of the information systems success model: Empirical evidence from Italy’, Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), pp. 1173–1184.
[51] Hair, J.F. (2009) ‘Multivariate data analysis’.
[52] Hair, J.F. et al. (2012) ‘An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research’, Journal of the academy of marketing science, 40(3), pp. 414–433.
[53] Hair Jr, J.F. et al. (2014) ‘Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research’, European business review [Preprint].
[54] Hair Jr, J.F. et al. (2021) ‘Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook’. Springer Nature.
[55] Lee, K. and Joshi, K. (2017) ‘Examining the use of status quo bias perspective in IS research: need for re‐conceptualizing and incorporating biases’, Information Systems Journal, 27(6), pp. 733–752.
)
