Document Type : بحث

Authors

Abstract

     The Cox regression model is one of the models that is frequently used in the analysis of survival data, used to determine the relationship between the explanatory variables available for the studied item and their survival time. The aim in this study is to analyze the survival time of patients with leukemia using the two statistical models (Cox regression model and competing risk model). The data used in this study is the Type I of censoring observational data that was taken from Nanakali Hospital-Erbil for (120) patients with leukemia during (four years) starting from (January 1, 2019) to (May 30, 2022). The Akaike Information Standard (AIC), the Corrected Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc) and the Bayesian Information Standard (BIC) are used for each model to compare two models, which model fits the data. As a result, it shows that the competing risk model fits the cause and that the factor (type of cure) and the (Anemic Condition) factor are the most dangerous for leukemia.

Keywords

  1. Abderrahim Oulhaj et al., 2020.The competing risk between in-hospital mortality and recovery: A pitfall in COVID-19 survival analysis research. Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
  2. Alhasawi, E., 2015. Survival Analysis Approaches for Prostate Cancer. Sudbury, Ontario, Canada: Laurentian University.
  3. Balakrishnan, N. & RAO, C. R., 2004. Handbook of Statistics 23_ Advances in Survival Analysis. north holand: s.n.
  4. Biost, A. (2004). Introduction to Survival Analysis. new yourk: A Stata Press Publication.
  5. Bsrat Tesfay et al., 2021. Survival analysis of Time to Death of Breast Cancer Patients: in case of Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital Tigray, Ethiopia. Corresponding author: Endeshaw Assefa Derso, College of Natural and Computational Science, Department of Statistics, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.
  6. Burnham, Kenneth P. and David R. Anderson. 1998. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretical Approach. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  7. Stihsen et al., 2017. The outcome of the surgical treatment of pelvic chondrosarcomas: a competing risk analysis of 58 tumors from a single center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  8. Ekman, A., 2017. Variable selection for the Cox proportional hazards model. Umea university, 21 January.p. 84.
  9. Fox, John, 2014. Introduction to Survival analysis. sociology 761.
  10. Frank Emmert-Streib and Matthias Dehmer. 2019. Predictive Society and Data Analytics Lab, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, FI-33101 Tampere, Finland
  11. Guo, S., 2010. Survival analysis. 1st ed. New York: Oxford university press, Inc.
  12. Harrell, F. E., 2001. Regression Modeling with Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis. Nashville, TN 37232-2637: Springer Science+Business Media New York.
  13. Heagerty, P., 2005. Survival Analysis. new work: Va/Uw Summer.
  14. Hout, A. V. D., 2017. multi-state survival models for interval censored data. U.S.: taylor & francis group.
  15. Mark, s., 2007. An Introduction to Survival Analysis. EpiCentre, IVABS, pp. 2-31.
  16. Liu, x., 2012. Survival analysis 'models and applications'. 1st ed. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  17. Michele Provenzano et al., 2018. Competing-Risk Analysis of Death and End Stage Kidney Disease by Hyperkaliemia Status in Non-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Receiving Stable Nephrology Care. Journal of Clinical Medicine.
  18. Qi, J. (2009). Comparison of Proportional Hazards and Accelerated Failure Time Models. Saskatchewan, 1-89.
  19. Schmidt, P. & WITTE, A. D., 1998. Predicting Recidivism Using Survival Models. 1st ed. London: Springer verlag.
  20. Vittinghoff, E. 2004. Statistics for Biology Health, Second edition. Science+Business Media, New York.
  21. Wolbers, marcel, et al., 2009. Prognostic models with competing risks: methods and application to coronary risk prediction. Epidemiology 20.4 (555-561).
  22. Wienke, A., 2011. Frailty models in survival analysis. 1st ed. USA: Taylor & Francis group, LLC.
  23. Xin, x., 2011. A STUDY OF TIES AND TIME-VARYING COVARIATES IN COX PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL. University of Guelph, pp. 1-43.
  24. Zhou, Bingquing et al., 2011. “Competing risks regression for stratified data”. Biometrics (661-670).